A double-standard on social media marketing?
Jul 24th
One commentary from Trey Pennington reflects a common obstacle for many of us — a clear management double standard regarding social media versus traditional channels:
I think we’ll all find that measuring ROI for social media isn’t really that challenging … yes, ROI is exclusively a dollar denominated (or percentage) measure. If you’re not measuring dollars back in/dollars out, then you’re not measuring ROI.
That being said, Dave Lahkani makes a good point in his new post: the discussion about social media ROI is an excuse. Because people touting social media keep talking in circles about ROI, executives know they can squash a new idea just by questioning “ROI.” Besides, they sound really smart using an acronym.
Do those same executives debate the ROI of their executive perks? Their bonuses? Conferences? Or, do they really spend that much time pondering the ROI for THEIR favorite media?
I once worked with a large B2B firm that spent 1/2 of it’s entire marketing/advertising/PR/IR budget on display advertising in trade magazines. Even after I showed them a media buyer’s study documenting their target market did not read the trade pubs, they continued the trade flight. Why? Because their head-to-head competitor did. (I wonder if the competitor was doing the same thing!)
Bottom line: we need to merely document the impact engagement through social media has on financial performance and be bold at engaging while we do.
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
The most important question in social media marketing
Jul 23rd
Why? Because grandma always told me to deal with what is, not what we wish for. We have to be realists. Your best efforts to achieve accurate financial measurement may be constrained by technology, budget and resources. So, if you can’t get there in the near-term, what DO you measure? That’s why we’ll now turn the discussion to non-financial indicators (NFI’s) and the critical importance of selecting the correct measurement strategy for your social media marketing efforts.
There are hundreds of potential NFI’s but there is only one question you need to know to pick the right one: What behavior am I trying to drive?
So you can see how powerful and critically important choosing the correct metric can be. And if you do, a magical thing will happen — Your marketing activities will begin to conform to that goal. The manner and level of engagement will rise to meet the need of pushing that metric higher and higher. If you choose wisely, the appropriate NFI will make your strategy EVOLVE!
What behavior are YOU trying to drive and how are your metrics supporting it? Sharing your ideas would help our community.
The next article in this series will examine specific options as you try to answer this most important question in marketing measurement.
This is Part Five of a series examining social media marketing measurement.
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
Social media ROI and the mystery of brand equity
Jul 22nd
“A well-known brand can enhance the perceived value of a product. For example, a brand can assure customers of consistent product quality, differentiate the product from competitive offerings, or facilitate customer’s purchase decisions. In many cases, the principle source of a brand’s added value is the set of associations customers hold in memory.”
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
More irresponsible social media financial "research"
Jul 21st
One of the hottest articles on the web yesterday was a new study by Wetpaint and Altimeter Group proclaiming that they had cracked the code on social media value measurement. It is also one of the most irresponsible examples of data mis-management and audience manipulation I have observed.
The report trumpets with breathless enthusiasm that “for the first time ever, Wetpaint/Altimeter Group have gone beyond surface case studies to measure the true financial value of social media.”
But what’s this … buried on page 6: “While no one yet has the data to determine direct cause and effect, what we do find is a financial correlation between those who are deeply engaged and those who outperform their peers.”
Wait a minute … At this point I have to ask the report’s authors, Ben Elowitz and Charlene Li, how can you seriously purport to “measure the true financial value of social media,” while admitting that nobody has the data to do so? What are trying to pull on us here?
So WHAT did they do? I give Elowitz/Li props for developing a secret formula to measure social media engagement by 40 criteria. But it just goes downhill from there.
1) They are making their claims based on ONE YEAR of financial data and THREE MONTHS of social media engagement. Is that an appropriate timeframe to discover anything you are claiming to be a trend? You’re trying to make a statistical correlation to financial performance based on limited data during a RECESSION?
2) So, what IS the correlation? Is it a strong statistical correlation? Did you actually apply the correct mathematical tools to this analysis? How would we know? Are you seriously telling me that the social media budget of these companies is having a measurable and material impact on the financial results? You have discerned the unique contribution of Facebook compared to billions of dollars spent on advertising and decades of brand-equity building?
3) Finally, I could make an argument that your “data” provide a conclusion quite the opposite of what you’re trying to spin here. Well-managed companies generally manage EVERYTHING well. Is it any surprise that Coca-Cola and Starbucks have a successful social media effort? I will challenge you that the financial success of these premier brands enabled the creation of the effective social media programs, not the other way around!
Here is the real message from this “break-through study:” Financially-successful companies with important brands invest in deep social media engagement. That is hardly earth-shaking.
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender









You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow.
Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here.
-Mark Schaefer

