Pump up the jams

This is post #300 on {grow} so I thought this would be a good opportunity to pause and just say THANKS!

If you ever want a case study for somebody who has fell in love with his blog community, it would be me. The true friendships, new connections and opportunities that have come through {grow} have been one of the highlights of my career. You take me to school every day.  And if we haven’t connected personally yet, I would love to hear from you by phone, email or maybe even a live visit some time.

We’ve come a long way. Monthly page views have already doubled in 2010 and as you may know, {grow} was nominated for blog of the year in an industry competition.   For me, the true highlight was that we were nominated by a man I admire so much and one of our great community members, Danny Brown (who won the award last year).   In addition to Danny, the other award nominees are Jason Falls, Todd Defren and Gini Dietrich. Are you kidding me? They are all TREMENDOUS!  So if you would like to vote for {grow} or one of these folks, you can do it HERE.

By the way, a sort of extemporaneous “get out the vote” for {grow} campaign broke out on Twitter today.   Thanks for this sentiment and your passionate enthusiasm!   Compared to some of the other communities, we’re still small but hey, we’re mighty!

Thank you for spending your time here so faithfully and for letting me be your “chief conversation starter.”  I never take you for granted and can’t wait to pump up the jams with you on the next 300 posts!

Cleaning house on Twitter: A drama in 10 tweets

Part ONE.  The curtain rises.

There was a brouhaha on the Twitterstream recently when Spike Jones, a blogger and SVP at Fleishmann-Hilliard, challenged some people by name to delete their huge Twitter accounts and start over.  The original (excellent) article sparking the discussion by Leah Jones can be found HERE and a follow-up post by Spike, HERE.  The idea of eliminating followers created a  … stir.

Part TWO.  What’s the fuss?

I presented this drama because … well, I couldn’t resist it.  Antagonist, protagonist, love, hate, a leading lady, conflict and resolution in 10 tweets? Give me a break. Who doesn’t enjoy a good drama? Plus I found it refreshing that a few folks on Twitter actually showed up as real people.

So besides the question of honor and bileful little men, what raised this ruckus?

The idea that “numbers don’t matter” is one of the most emotional subjects I’ve witnessed on the social web.  It’s our precious little secret: Most people pretend they don’t care, but they do.  Here is the yin and yang of the social media “numbers.”

YIN

The number of friends or followers might be a reasonable indication of a person’s presence on the social web.

… YANG

But for Pete’s sakes, treat EVERYBODY with respect.  All too often I see people forgetting that there is a real person behind that little icon.

YIN

Larger numbers of followers can enhance reputation. I recently saw Chris Brogan present and he admitted honestly that he has 180,000 followers “but half of them are spammers and porn stars.” In some (rare) cases, quality of followers really doesn’t matter. It’s a badge.

… YANG

Quality of followers should matter in most cases. Why would you knowingly surround yourself with porn stars …. unless you’re a porn star? I want to surround myself with relevant, interesting people.  My audience is a public record of who I am.

YIN

In many cases, large number of followers can deliver higher numbers of potential connections, business benefits and information.

… YANG

Even with wonderful utilities like Tweetdeck, it’s a stretch to have a meaningful connection with more than a couple hundred people.

Part THREE. A simple truth about followers.

So, there are arguments both ways.  But let me give you another perspective.

When I became active on Twitter, a young lady followed me with a provocative profile picture. This was at a time when porn folks were absolutely over-running Twitter and I was blocking them as fast as I could. The next day this same young lady wrote to tell me she was a university student in the U.K. and was following me to learn from me. She was disappointed that I had proven to be so elitist by blocking her and not including her in my audience.

Obviously I corrected the situation and apologized, but here’s the lesson I learned — I need to consider it an HONOR to have interested followers.

I realized that Twitter is not necessarily about me, what I gain out of it, and what’s convenient to meet my needs.   Every person on the other end of the tweet has their own reason to connect to me too. Eliminating them wholesale as Leah and Spike suggests seems disrespectful to good people who followed me in good faith.

I realize this is a very personal point of view and may not fit for you, but what are your thoughts about cleaning house on your followers?

It’s 2 a.m. Do you know where your email address is?

I’d like to share with you a paragraph from the New York Times on last week’s public exposure of 114,000 email addresses through an iPad security breach at AT&T:

AT&T Inc., reaching out to iPad users Sunday to explain why their email addresses were released last week, blamed the incident on “computer hackers” who “maliciously exploited” an attempt by the carrier to speed the process of logging in to its website.

The comments were the harshest yet by the carrier, which apologized for the security lapse and said it would cooperate with any efforts to investigate or prosecute the breach.

“AT&T takes your privacy seriously and does not tolerate unauthorized access to its customers’ information or company websites,” the company said.

The article goes on to say that to make matters worse, the breach was discovered by an outside company who claimed that without their disclosure, AT&T “would have never fixed it.”

Is anybody else outraged by this ridiculous statement by AT&T?  Damn it guys — How seriously do you actually take our privacy when the freaking service just went on sale two months ago and it was already hacked?  Do you think you’ve tested this sufficiently to prevent such an obvious problem? Apparently the breach was so easy it should have been quickly detected by your own internal analysts.

Can you believe those nasty ol’ “malicious” hackers would do such a thing to you? Poor babies!  What were you expecting dudes?  Benevolent hackers?  Mother Theresa hackers?  Care Bear hackers? This was your OWN FAULT!

When you observe the recent massive fails at Google, Facebook, and now AT&T, is there any question that it is just a matter of “when,” not “if” that this whole creaky system goes down in the biggest Internet privacy calamity yet?

It’s hard not to draw a comparison to the Internet fails and the disastrous oil spill.  Coming from a manufacturing background, I’m absolutely blown away that BP didn’t monitor and maintain a mission-critical process like the safety procedures on an ocean oil rig.  It’s criminal. If some hackers rubes can get around a few controls to access personal information from my iPad without much trouble, what’s brewing with the real cyber-terrorists out there?

Where are the standard testing procedures? Why aren’t these companies hiring their own hackers to discover flaws? Why is a company with the resources of AT&T taking shortcuts with our privacy?  When will it be time for national regulations and accountability on Internet security? Why wouldn’t AT&T and the others be investigated and fined for privacy breaches?

Sorry to be such a downer today folks and I know I’m opening up Pandora’s box on this issue but when I think about how our way of life on the Internet could be jeopardized by the way these large corporations are managing critical processes I can’t help but be alarmed.

The new realities of marketing through YouTube

I recently spent a nice evening at a friend’s house as he showed me his favorite YouTube videos (including the Nike soccer video) on a giant high-definition TV.  The videos were being fed into the TV wirelessly through his iPhone. It was a lot of fun until we came to the older, grainy videos which were almost un-watchable on the large-screen format. I started thinking about how much YouTube has changed and the implications for marketing. I’m just weird that way. : )

Our beloved YouTube turned five years old last week and now hosts an incredible 2 billion page views per day (third largest website) and 24 hours of new content is uploaded every minute. It’s hard to ignore, isn’t it?

Some new things to consider:

High def, high expectations –  The little episode at my friend’s house illustrates four important trends:

  • The big brands are dominating the channel with blockbuster info-mercials. The bar for quality is being raised for all of us.
  • YouTube is becoming mainstream entertainment. Watching on large-format screens is becoming typical, again pointing to a need for quality.
  • Videos can now be pretty much accessed anywhere, any time with the advent of smart phones.
  • YouTube’s new “high-definition” option is helping to enable the quality revolution.

One of the charming characteristics of the original YouTube was that it actually lowered peoples expectations for quality.  The most popular, funniest videos were usually grainy home-made clips of the “Star Wars Boy” or “Keyboard Cat.” Unfortunately those days are coming to an end.

Small screen is king. The most popular iPhone app is You Tube.  And this presents quite a dilemma. How do you produce a video that will show up well on a large screen … and also a mobile phone (which can effectively present little more than a talking head)? This is a vital consideration, especially if your target market is most likely to be mobile.

Audio quality is also a bigger deal than it used to be, driven by the needs on the high end and the low end. That built-in camera mic might not cut-it any more!

Pay-per-click advertising and promoted videos can now be be part of the search results within YouTube. The promoted videos include a thumbnail of video and drives you to a video, not a website. Participating in the paid videos also allows you to enable text overlays on the video which can be a call-to-action or a simple web address.

Video annotations — Another trend is gimmicks like word balloons on videos. This might be a good promotional tool and an effective way to add depth to your video but it might have limited effectiveness on mobile phones.

What’s not new … but still relevant:

  • Blatant advertising doesn’t work.
  • If a video is truly interesting and useful, it will be watched. Educate, inform, entertain.
  • YouTube is still a high-potential, low-cost marketing opportunity
  • Be sure to optimize your video descriptions for keyword search.
  • Don’t overlook using YouTube as a way to connect and build community.  Explore the option of providing video comments.  Tagging comments on to more popular videos could drive traffic to your channel.
  • While there seems to be an emotional backlash against Facebook, Foursquare and Twitter, YouTube doesn’t seem to have the political and privacy baggage of the other guys. YouTube is the teddy bear of the social web.

Cutting through this deluge of content is challenging, especially for a small business. Everybody’s on YouTube now, so you just can’t  just be there. You have to be there and be great.

What are your observations on the new realities of marketing through YouTube? What did I miss?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...