Social media ROI and the mystery of brand equity
Jul 22nd
“A well-known brand can enhance the perceived value of a product. For example, a brand can assure customers of consistent product quality, differentiate the product from competitive offerings, or facilitate customer’s purchase decisions. In many cases, the principle source of a brand’s added value is the set of associations customers hold in memory.”
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
More irresponsible social media financial "research"
Jul 21st
One of the hottest articles on the web yesterday was a new study by Wetpaint and Altimeter Group proclaiming that they had cracked the code on social media value measurement. It is also one of the most irresponsible examples of data mis-management and audience manipulation I have observed.
The report trumpets with breathless enthusiasm that “for the first time ever, Wetpaint/Altimeter Group have gone beyond surface case studies to measure the true financial value of social media.”
But what’s this … buried on page 6: “While no one yet has the data to determine direct cause and effect, what we do find is a financial correlation between those who are deeply engaged and those who outperform their peers.”
Wait a minute … At this point I have to ask the report’s authors, Ben Elowitz and Charlene Li, how can you seriously purport to “measure the true financial value of social media,” while admitting that nobody has the data to do so? What are trying to pull on us here?
So WHAT did they do? I give Elowitz/Li props for developing a secret formula to measure social media engagement by 40 criteria. But it just goes downhill from there.
1) They are making their claims based on ONE YEAR of financial data and THREE MONTHS of social media engagement. Is that an appropriate timeframe to discover anything you are claiming to be a trend? You’re trying to make a statistical correlation to financial performance based on limited data during a RECESSION?
2) So, what IS the correlation? Is it a strong statistical correlation? Did you actually apply the correct mathematical tools to this analysis? How would we know? Are you seriously telling me that the social media budget of these companies is having a measurable and material impact on the financial results? You have discerned the unique contribution of Facebook compared to billions of dollars spent on advertising and decades of brand-equity building?
3) Finally, I could make an argument that your “data” provide a conclusion quite the opposite of what you’re trying to spin here. Well-managed companies generally manage EVERYTHING well. Is it any surprise that Coca-Cola and Starbucks have a successful social media effort? I will challenge you that the financial success of these premier brands enabled the creation of the effective social media programs, not the other way around!
Here is the real message from this “break-through study:” Financially-successful companies with important brands invest in deep social media engagement. That is hardly earth-shaking.
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
Your social media ROI shock treatment
Jul 21st
Today, let’s do a very simple calculation to determine how much cash your social media strategy should be generating to justify its existence. I think this might just blow your mind.
I’ll have to make some broad assumptions because every company is different, but you can insert your own numbers and do the math for your own organization.
Let’s assume you are a medium-sized company, and have one person working full-time on social media marketing. We’ll assign that person a salary of $60,000.
In a typical company, health, 401(k) and other benefit costs equal another 50% of the base salary, or in this case, an additional $30,000.
We’ll assign another 20% of base salary for overhead such as office space, shared services support and technology. That’s $12,000. We’re on a tight budget so we will forbid our new employee to do any travel, training, or company entertaining. And forget about bonuses this year. No whining, either!
So, our full-up cost for one social media professional is $102,000.
Let’s assume your company has a moderate profit margin of 15%. So, to break even and just cover the incremental costs of your new social media initiative, this professional would have to produce quantifiable new sales of $680,000. In other words, you would have to make that amount of money to have an ROI of 0.0% on a year’s worth of social media expense and effort.
That’s a lot of money for a lot of nothing, isn’t it? There are two reasons why I needed to shock you into social media de-tox.
First, I wanted to bring home the point that social media is not “free.” Even a modest effort at a small company takes a lot of time, which must be funded through the sweat of your manufacturing and sales efforts.
The second reason is this: For now, some companies may be willing to experiment with social media, but at some point the big boss is going to sharpen her pencil. If you can’t accurately and logically measure what you do, your marketing initiative will be in peril, as it should be.
The other day, I heard an “A-List” blogger tell his audience, “If your company is not expecting you to account for your efforts with financial measures, well, that’s just great — do whatever you want!”
And for a short period of time, you might get away with it. But to gain credibility as a company leader in a B2B environment, you must hold your activities accountable to the same standards as an engineer trying to get funds approved for a new production facility. You should be able to demonstrate a business case and that business case must be built on hard dollars … eventually.
In the mean time, the softer side of metrics may be the only thing available. Tomorrow we’ll start taking a look at the importance of “non-financial indicators” that can influence brand equity.
This is part 2 in a series addressing social media marketing measurement issues.
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender
The Biggest Lie in Social Media Marketing
Jul 20th
“When you ask businesses why they are participating in social media, what do they say? If they say, “to make money,” then they will fail, because currency in the social web is found in both relationships and content.”
Part 2: Social media ROI shock treatment
Part 3: Irresponsible social media measurement research
Part 4: Social media impact on brand equity
Part 5: The most important question to ask in social media marketing
Part 6: A double standard for social media marketing?
Part 7: Yes, it IS about the money!
Part 8: Creating a measurement plan
Part 9: Measurement is like a bartender








You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow.
Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here.
-Mark Schaefer










ROI and measurement