Social media and politics
Political oversight. A {growtoon}.
Jan 27th
Join the growtoonists each Friday for a humorous take on marketing, social media, and current business events.
Joey Strawn is a social media strategist that loves enjoying a good book and then drawing in it. Check him out on Twitter: @joey_strawn
Getting to yes on adopting social media marketing
Nov 17th
If you can’t see this video frame, click here to view.
One of the biggest challenges for any social media change agent is getting a company to understand the power and potential of the channel to a point where they say “yes.”
I recently caught up with one of my favorite marketing intellects, David Rosen of Burson Marsteller in New York and he was told me about how he leveraged external news events to nurture client social media activities at an enterprise level. This was so interesting and I decided to flip on the camera so I could share this conversation with the {grow} community.
The conversation with David also gets into getting beyond “yes” and turning social media into a channel that helps companies lower costs, contribute to R&D, and sell more products.
Please contribute your thoughts on this topic in the comment section!
Obama’s Town Hall Meeting versus Twitter Truth
Jul 6th
The premiere social media event of the week is U.S President Obama’s ”Twitter town hall,” today. The president will take questions posed through the #askobama hashtag during a discussion moderated by Jack Dorsey, a co-founder of Twitter.
The White House said it wants the talk to focus on the economy, but Mr. Obama is sure to get asked all sorts of things when he takes questions from the Twitterverse. But is this really going to reflect what the Twitter Nation wants to hear, or is this just going to be a political dog and pony show?
I wondered … would it be possible to use analytical tools to actually predict what questions would be used today? Of course it all gets down to the judgment of a few people actually setting the agenda, but at least based on the volume of suggested questions coming in, what should the Town Hall discussion be about?
Our loyal {grow} community member Dan Holowack was up to the task. He offered to put his proprietary software tool, TwitSprout, to the test to try to predict the agenda today. It will be interesting to see if the actual questions in today’s meeting line up with Dan’s predictions. Here is his analysis:
The Town Hall and Twitter Truth
My team has literally stayed up all night analyzing well over 10,000 unique questions in the hours leading up to the deadline. As you can see, there has been a frenzy of increasing activity:
Looking for tweet themes
It’s still an open problem in artificial intelligence for computers to “understand” human language, even in constrained settings like this one. Separating the real questions from the garbage is therefore more of an art than a science — we were forced to use a bunch of heuristics for this initial pass, but our tests indicate that they work quite well. According to this measure, just under 60% of all #AskObama tweets are genuine questions.
Once we identified the “legitimate” questions, they were passed through further filters to combine tweets that are just retweets or quotes of one another, to bring the quantity down to a more manageable level. Finally, these tweets were sorted in descending order by popularity and influence, and one of our team members went through them manually, grouping them into high-level categories (“Jobs”, “Taxes”, etc) by hand. By adding together all of the tweets in these categories, we can get a real sense of which topics are on the minds of Americans.
Our Predictions
To predict which questions Mr. Obama will answer today, it would be nice to know how they’re being chosen. According to Twitter, the team at Mass Relevance (plus Jack Dorsey) are the ones entrusted with curating and selecting the lucky tweets. Nobody can be sure exactly what their selection process will look like, but it’s safe to say it’ll be some combination of the following:
1. Random selection: In true democratic fashion, all tweets might be treated equal and have the same chance of being picked at random. While nobody can complain about the fairness, it might lead to some really strange results.
2. Sheer numbers: The best questions are being retweeted hundreds of times, and the cream is really rising to the top. The team could select the most retweeted and RT’ed tweets as the questions the most Americans care about.
3. Popularity contest: There are many ways of measuring influence on Twitter — whether it’s Klout, follower count, or your TwitSprout dashboard. However they choose to measure it, the questions asked by the most important people might be the lucky ones.
4. Politics as usual: Of course, it’s not impossible that the White House has already “vetted” a series of questions from their own talking points, and the team is simply looking for people on Twitter who asked the same things.
We can’t do much about #1 and #4, but the information we’ve gathered gives us everything we need for the other cases. Questions will still be coming in, but assuming nothing dramatic happens, these are the most popular and the most influential questions so far.
“Most Popular”
If all that matters is quantity, these are the tweets that have gathered the most retweets, quotes, and RTs:
#1 (with 2,907 retweets): “Would you consider legalizing marijuana to increase revenue and save tax dollars by freeing up crowded prisons, court rooms?”
#2 (with 1,567 retweets): “You’ve said many times that the Bush Cuts for the 2% Should Expire. Can you promise to let them in 2012?”
#3 (with 750 retweets): “Mr. President, why should you not be held responsible for your silly prediction that unemployment would stay below 8%?”
“Most Influential”
If we look for the tweets made by the most influential users — those with the most Klout and followers — we get a different set (although they have one tweet in common!)
#1 “Tech and knowledge industries are thriving, yet jobs discussion always centers on manufacturing. Why not be realistic about jobs?”
#2 “Mr. President, why should you not be held responsible for your silly prediction that unemployment would stay below 8%?”
#3: “Why do we have 1.5 million fewer jobs than we did before the stimulus when the # of ATMs is unchanged?”
“By Category”
Thanks to our manual grouping of tweets, we can also figure out which categories are the most popular (even if the team chooses some other specific tweet to represent it). There’s always a bit of subjectivity involved when making some of the decisions here, but most of our results should surprise nobody:
#1 Legalization of Marijuana (4,911 total tweets and retweets)
#2 Jobs (2,024 total tweets and retweets)
#3 Taxes (1,800 total tweets and retweets)
#4 Economy and Debt Ceiling (442 total tweets and retweets)
The one surprise is the winner of this category — marijuana laws. Regardless of which side of this debate his opinion happens to fall, if the president doesn’t address this point during tomorrow’s discussion, somebody is avoiding the data. By a landslide, this is what the Twitterverse wants to know.
The post-mortem
This section of the blog post was added AFTER the Town Hall event. How did it turn out?
THE GOOD
What did we get right? We feel we matched the major categories of things Obama focused on — tax cuts, the debt ceiling, and job creation — but that wasn’t very difficult to do. More specifically, we nailed the third tweet Obama answered:
Tech and knowledge industries are thriving, yet jobs discussion always centers on manufacturing. Why not be realistic about jobs?
This one was right on our dashboard, and we had singled it out because @Kim, a very high-Klout user, was one of the many who put their weight behind it. The White House chose the earliest version of the tweet, by @dmscott (with slightly lower Klout), but the logic is clear — this tweet was chosen for the high-level support it received.
Another one we expected, but for a completely different reason, was Obama’s 8th:
Mr. President, In several states we have seen people lose their collective bargaining rights. Do you have a plan to rectify this?
According to our calculations, at the time of the Town Hall, this tweet had been mentioned, retweeted, or RT’ed over 182 times — making it the 4th-most active tweet in the Jobs category, and 14th overall. This is high enough to be on our list of likely predictions, although not high enough to earn one of the few spots on the Dashboard itself. Even though the tweeter, @pmglynn, is not very influential (with only around 100 followers), the question itself generated a lot of discussion and interest. It was an excellent candidate, and both TwitSprout and Obama appear to think so.
THE BAD
We definitely stand by all the predictions we made — there was solid reasoning behind each of them, and we’re confident they would have made excellent questions; however, there are a couple of predictions we didn’t make that, in hindsight, probably would have made sense.
The most obvious omission is @johnboehner’s provocative tweet:
After embarking on a record spending binge that’s left us deeper in debt, where are the jobs?
At the time of the Town Hall, this question had been propagated 79 times: a nontrivial amount, but only enough to place it in 10th place in the Jobs category, and much lower overall. There are two things that should have tipped us off about it, however:
- Even though @johnboehner’s Klout is only 69, his influence on President Obama is considerably higher. His position as Speaker of the House undoubtedly played a role in Mass Relevance’s decision. Of course, there’s no automated tools that would detect this. We simply should have thought of it.
- Even though the full form of the tweet had only 79 propagations, the snappier version “Where are the jobs?” by itself had 341 of them — enough to place it in 2nd place in the Jobs category, and 6th place overall, which would certainly have gotten our attention — except that this tweet didn’t make sense to us, since we didn’t see it in context with Boehner’s tweet (they were far apart in our rankings). Of course, we had algorithms to detect subtle rewordings between tweets, but these two didn’t trigger them.
THE UGLY
We might as well come out and address the elephant in the room. It was obvious to anyone who had followed our predictions, those of Simply Measured, or paid even casual attention to the #AskObama stream, that there was one topic getting a large share of the buzz: the legalization of marijuana. Although the topic of the Town Hall was ostensibly about the economy, it was becoming clear that people did think of this as an economic issue. By our measurements, the two most popular tweets of the entire stream, were:
Would you consider legalizing marijuana to increase revenue and save tax dollars by freeing up crowded prisons, court rooms?
Pres. Obama: Why can’t we discuss legalizing cannabis to create jobs and save millions annually on enforcement?
These two messages accounted for more impressions than every question about taxation put together! An event that emphasizes popular opinion as a tool for accountability could surely not fail to address these questions in the depth they deserve; but, of course, the topic was notable only for its absence. The President discussed the war on drugs merely tangentially, for less than half a minute.
Ah, politics as usual : )
Thanks to Dan and and his team for pulling two all-nighters to produce this post!
How Social Media Turned a Brand Into a Revolution
Feb 27th
As protesters in Cairo’s Tahrir Square faced off against government forces, they were prepared with this Facebook lesson from supporters in Tunisia: “Advice to the youth of Egypt: Put vinegar or onion under your scarf for tear gas.”
This exchange (as reported by the New York Times) was part of a remarkable two-year social media collaboration that began with bloggers calling for labor strikes and resulted in an energetic youth movement that is toppling dictators.
And I can’t help but wonder in a very public way, was I wrong?
Just a few months ago, I declared in “Is Social Media Creating a Generation of Cowards?” that I agreed with Malcom Gladwell’s now famous contention that “the revolution will not be tweeted.” He compared the heroic activism of the Civil Rights Movement to the “slacktivism” of today’s Facebook culture where involvement ends at “liking” a page. He boldly stated — and I agreed — that the weak connections and lack of organizational structure on the social web was unlikely to enable radical social change.
Was I wrong?
Yes, I was. I had completely missed a big idea that had nothing to do with organizational dynamics: Social media can be used to build and ignite a brand — even when the product is a political revolution! In fact, marketing has played an extremely important role in the shifting Arab political landscape.
Like the rest of the world, I was fascinated by the courage and discipline of the youth movement in Tunisia, Egypt and beyond. I’ve read as much as I could consume and although I do not have the benefit of a first-hand experience with the situation, I think that without question, social media enabled the movement, united protesters, and kept the revolutionaries one step ahead of the government counter-measures.
If you have any doubt about the courage displayed by the protesters or the critical role of Facebook and Twitter, click on the image above and watch a short video about the “Facebook Flat” in Cairo.
While the protesters relied on classic tactics of nonviolent resistance, they also owe their success to marketing savvy borrowed from Silicon Valley.
The mastermind of the movement was Wael Ghonim, a 31-year-old Google marketing executive. Inspired by bloggers such as Ahmed Maher, Ghonim had little experience in politics but an intense dislike for the abusive Egyptian police. While the underground revolution had actually been fomenting since 2005, it needed a business perspective to get off the ground.
“I worked in marketing,” he said. “And I knew that if you build a brand you can get people to trust the brand.”
The marketer’s first campaign was a Facebook group called We Are All Khalid Said, after a young Egyptian who was beaten to death by police.
Ghonim filled the site with video clips and newspaper articles about police violence. He repeatedly hammered home a simple and memorable brand message: “This is your country.”
Engaging the “customers”
He eventually attracted hundreds of thousands of followers to the site and the “brand” actively engaged with them. For example, when organizers planned a “day of silence” in the Cairo streets, he polled users on what color shirts they should all wear — black or white. Finally, after the Tunisian revolution on Jan. 14, Ghonim used the Facebook site to mobilize support for a public protest. He asked for a pledge from 50,000 followers to turn out in protest. More than 100,000 signed up.
“I have never seen a revolution that was pre-announced before,” he said. Or, another way to look at it: He was launching the brand.
When a protest started to become a movement, best practices were shared via Facebook from counterparts in Tunisia and Serbia. Young Egyptian and Tunisian activists brainstormed on the use of technology to evade surveillance, commiserated about torture and traded practical tips on how to stand up to rubber bullets and organize barricades … primarily over social media platforms like the April 6 Movement Facebook page and Twitter.
On February 1, 2011 (the day the Internet was turned back on), Egypt gained 100,000 new Facebook users.
Al-Jazeera, a news channel with an agenda, added drama and emotion to the brand by broadcasting heroic stories and swelling theme songs. The revolution became an ongoing music video.
Entering new markets
Like all popular brands, this is already reaching into new markets like Libya. Where could it go next to reach new customers? This entry from the Youth Movement Facebook page may provide a clue:
So that’s the story of how I was wrong … and so is Gladwell because he missed this point, too. We were both looking at historical events and organizational dynamics, not realizing that the new social media business models can be applied to a wide variety of human activities, even something as unlikely and startling as toppling a dictatorship.
I realize my characterization of this revolution as a “brand” is unorthodox and I don’t want to come across as disrespectful in any way. I would never diminish the truly heroic personal efforts and sacrifices made in the face of real danger.
But I also think it’s important to recognize these new communication and societal dynamics and how social media will be used in ways we could never imagine. Truly, the revolution is just beginning. For all of us.










You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow.
Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here.
-Mark Schaefer








