Sorting through the Social Media Code of Conduct
Apr 21st
This is a difficult post to write, but I have an issue on my mind … and that is usually a signal that it might be on your mind too. Let’s talk it out together.
When there is a crisis in the news like the Boston bombing and manhunt, social media adds a layer of complexity — and perhaps confusion — to an already complex and confusing situation.
Like nearly every American, I was transfixed by the TV images and felt shock from the havoc created by these two young men. It just felt like ANY social media posting other than something that was Boston-strong related was inappropriate.
But even with this awareness, when I read something interesting on the Internet during my day, I will instinctively tweet it (or schedule it to be tweeted later). I have been doing this day after day for years — assuming that if I’m interested in something, my Twitter tribe might be interested too. I read, tweet, repeat.
During the Boston crisis, I was mindful of the emotions of the country and toned down my normal chatter. While this extraordinary drama was occurring, I mostly stayed social media silent. But occasionally, as a result of my habitual Twitter routine, I would tweet something non-Boston related that I came across during my working day.
After one such tweet, a follower (who I had never heard from before) scolded me and told me to “turn off the auto-tweet.” Ironically, there were no auto-tweets. It was me, simply tweeting out of habit. Even though I was aware of the crisis and had adjusted, I guess my brain was on auto-pilot.
I didn’t respond to this person, and at first was a little put-off that some stranger would have to act like the Twitter police. But upon reflection, I do think there is something to think about here …
The Social Media Code of Conduct
The Boston scenario demanded our attention, our respect, and our focus. But what constitutes a crisis, and how should social media publishers respond?
After the Newtown school massacre, I literally shut down my blog and, for the most part, my social media presence. However, during the Boston crisis, like most other bloggers, I let the blog posts run as they had been pre-scheduled for the week. I’m not sure I can really explain why my judgment was different this time. Was that a mistake? Is that insensitive? Where do you draw the line?
What is the Social Media Code of Conduct?
In the heart of the Boston news coverage, I came across this story:
April 18 — A government rocket attack killed at least 12 people in a village in central Syria Wednesday, while rebels battled regime forces over two key military base. Two children and three women were among those killed. An amateur video posted online showed at least seven bodies, including a young girl with a bloody gash to her head, laid out on the floor of a room. A man can be seen wrapping the body of a boy in a white sheet as another man standing over them cries out, “Is this child carrying a gun? This child is 12 years old. Oh God. You gave him to me and now you are taking him.”
Were you aware of this story? Is this a crisis too? What is the relative importance of a massacre in rural Syria versus downtown Boston?
About half of the readers of {grow} are from outside the U.S. Would a reader in the Middle East find it strange that I stopped my blog for the death of three people in Boston and not for the slaughter of 12 people in Syria? In London? In Melbourne?
Some “rules” are obvious
During every crisis, there are inevitably individuals and brands who go viral over what is regarded as insensitive tweets and posts. This is one of the most egregious:
Certainly the tastelessness of these tweets is beyond debate.
Author and social media celebrity Guy Kawaski also got pillaged by bloggers over his auto-tweets (and his defense of them) during the Boston news coverage.
But somewhere between the mindless insensitivity of Epicurious and the mindless mindlessness of Kawasaki’s auto-tweets about the sex life of frogs, there is a gray area. There is a “stop-publishing” tipping point that is beyond just common sense. There is some combination of news coverage, emotionality, national pride, and drama that is more nuanced.
If I created a business-related post during a national crisis, am I in violation of the unwritten Social Media Code of Conduct? What is that Code of Conduct? What constitutes a national crisis? How do you define national crisis if more than half your audience is not part of that nation?
Unfortunately in the world today, there will be no shortage of tragedies to test us.
This is one of those times when I don’t pretend to have the answers and would like to hear from you. In an era when we are all learning how to be “publishers,” how do you handle the etiquette of publishing in a crisis?
Image courtesy Provisions Flickr Creative Commons
Blogging turns the notion of competition upside down
Jun 3rd
I had to laugh out loud when I took this phone call the other day. A representative from a marketing agency in New York approached me about creating a guest post on my blog. Here is how it went:
ME: So what is it exactly that your company does?
HIM: We specialize in Social Media Marketing strategy.
ME: Really. Well, that’s what I do too.
HIM: I know. I’ve looked at your website.
ME: Well, you’re actually my competitor, right?
HIM: Yes, I suppose you could say that.
ME: So let me get this straight … (laughing) You are my competitor and you’re asking me to allow you to come on to my website to promote your business and attract business away from me? On top of that, you will be planting backlinks on my blog which are aimed to give you permanent advantage over me in the search engines.
HIM: Well … Yes, that’s true.
ME: Don’t you think that is a little crazy?
Now, what may seem even crazier is that I’m going to encourage him do it. In fact I help my competitors every day. Almost every person who provides a guest post on {grow} competes with me in some way! I don’t mind. It’s a big world and we can all prosper.
But the reason I wanted to tell this story is because if any “normal” business person really looked at the “best practices” on the social web, she would think we’re a bunch of blooming idiots! And maybe we are.
A couple competitors have used my original content in their company eNewsletters. Now think about that. They are taking my content (without permission) to compete against me in the marketplace. Basically, I am writing their ads for them.
Last week a lady wrote “Dear Mr. Schaefer, I wanted to let you know that we are using your blog post for an eBook our company is creating. We’re hoping you would help us promote it.” Now wait a minute. Can you first explain who you are and why you are taking my original copywritten material for your company promotion? How do I even know I want to be associated with your company?
Isn’t this nuts? Blogging turns the notion of competition upside down!
When I mentioned this observation to the New York guy who was on the phone with me he said, “Well I guess you could consider it an honor that your competitors want to be on your blog.”
What a world. Doesn’t it seem like the traditional notion of competition has gone out the door?
Photo by inspir8tion used with permission Flickr Creative Commons.
Why Facebook will become the most dangerous company on earth
Apr 10th
Within the next 60 days, an event will occur that may be the most devastating development in the young history of social media and for the businesses and individuals who love it so much.
Facebook is going to become a publicly-traded company.
If you have ever worked for a public company you can relate to what I am about to say. If you haven’t you’ll have to trust me.
The pressure of “public”
The entire tone of Facebook and its strategy is about to change in ways that I believe could portend desperation and disaster. Instead of managing for a long-term vision, becoming a public company creates an inexorable and relentless pressure to meet quarterly sales goals. If you have ever been an executive in a publicy-traded company, other than hearing “A crew from 60 Minutes is at the door,” there is probably no greater pressure in business than the demand to grow, grow, grow the revenues — To “beat the street,” without exception, without fail.
Maybe it will will take a few months, maybe it will take a year or more, but inevitably the marching orders of Facebook executives will be determined by this constant drumbeat of “more, higher, faster.”
Now, what is the source of Facebook’s growing revenues? You and me.
Virtually the entire economic model of Facebook is based on a single tactic — collect as much personal information about you as possible as a way to sell highly-targeted ads. So for Facebook to succeed, it simply must collect increasing amounts of information about you. More information = more ad revenues. Pretty simple.
Through this lens, we can now view Facebook’s new Timeline innovation as a clever move. The company encourages us to post and share everything about our lives, which will lead to more advertising opportunities. And, you can be assured that every new feature and innovation will be aimed at two things: 1) collect more information and 2) create “stickiness” so you spend more time on the site (to share information and view ads).
Is this sustainable?
So we have to consider — Is this relentless collection of information and selling of ads sustainable in a way that meets Wall Street’s expectations for continuous and aggressive growth?
At least in the near term, Facebook’s prospects seem bright. They are just starting to mine Timeline information. The possibility of organic growth in new countries like China present vast opportunities for data collection and advertising.
But will we reach a saturation point where it becomes impossible for Facebook to squeeze any more information from us? Will we reach a day when Facebook’s insatiable need for data becomes annoying and invasive? Is there a theoretical limit to information gathering? Is there an upper limit to the amount of time people will spend on Facebook?
The other collision point is that the advertising model is in transition. Smartphones are already the first screen of Internet access for 28 percent of Americans and in some parts of the world (like the Middle East), it is already over 50 percent. Compare how many ads you see displayed on your computer versus the smartphone version of Facebook and you will begin to see the crunch Facebook will be facing.
Google, which went public in 2004, faces exactly the same problem of course and I think the pressure is starting to show. I found it extremely odd when the company (who professes to never be “evil”) knowingly took a detour around anti-ad-tracking features on Apple’s iPhone to spy on our private information. They stopped the practice only after being caught by the Wall Street Journal. Apple vowed to stop the Google’s shady practices.
Why would Google do something this stupid? Well, by now you already know the answer — as a public company, Google is under incredible pressure to collect our private information to sell ads.
Similarly, executive bonuses are tied to the success of Google +. What kind of behavior will this drive at the company, when vast personal fortunes are at stake … and the platform increasingly appears to be a ghost town?
What will be the answer to the pressure for growth?
This is a glimpse of what we will one day see from Facebook, too. Undoubtedly they will look for adjacencies and new sources of revenue but nothing in the foreseeable future will come close to making a dent in their reliance on ad revenues.
At some point, Facebook will be faced with a reality — the well of personal information will be tapped dry. The opportunity to create advertising impressions will slow. Mark Zuckerberg will face unimaginable pressure from Wall Street and his shareholders. His company will have to find new ways to turn their vast resource — our personal information — into new sources of profits.
And at that point, Facebook will become the most dangerous company on earth.
How does this perspective land on you?
Social media sewage … and hope
Aug 29th
I’ve started and trashed this article at least six times.
As you will see, I have my reasons to be conflicted about publishing it. Yet I can’t deny this gnawing feeling of disenchantment about the social web that seems to be also reflected in so many other blog posts I have read recently.
I am a positive person. I want to lift people up. But at this moment, I can’t be “positive” and also be “honest.” I need to write about social media sewage for a moment. If you make it to the end of the article, it gets better!
There are three underlying economic drivers of social media that are creating desperate and increasingly unethical practices that are turning the social media space into a cesspool.
The first is search engine page rank, a business practice largely built on deception. I know there is much more to it than that (spare me the flaming comments) but face it, billions of dollars are spent each year in an effort to deceive Google. Those who do the best job become rich and are awarded rockstar status. On an almost daily basis, people make offers to me to participate in their complex SEO ruses. I recently told the story of a person lying to me (and other bloggers) to get a single link to their website.
Related to SEO is the battle against spam comments on my blog. These comments, using increasingly sophisticated ploys, are meant to provide a back link to a website or trick us into clicking on a link. Can you imagine that you and I are in a business where human beings are creating bots and building Third World sweats shops with the goal of getting you to click on a link for black market Viagra or worse? What kind of a person can wake up each day and be happy with that kind of a career?
I have been spending so much time purging porn-purveyors and MLM link-builders from my Twitter stream that I have now assigned a virtual assistant to the task. That’s right. I work in an industry where I have to pay an employee to keep pornographers away from me.
A second economic driver on the web is content. In an industry where content is power, people routinely steal and publish my original work – word for word — because that is easier and cheaper to do than creating their own material. Last week a young and promising blogger asked, “What do I do when somebody steals my content?” Unless you want to dedicate your life to chasing ghosts, the answer is “nothing.” I have given up.
Not only are people routinely stealing my content to promote ideals and businesses I despise, even my fellow bloggers think nothing of taking content from others, without license or permission, to promote their own commercial efforts. In the “real world” this would be a cause for a law suit. On the blogosphere it is celebrated as a best practice.
Another major economic driver on the Internet is social proof. By this I mean the numbers and badges — like number of Twitter followers or Klout scores – that provide a shortcut assessment of authority. In real life, we can actually meet people, watch them in a meeting, or observe the college degrees on their walls that create an impression of authority. On the social web, we usually only have shortcuts – social proof – to serve this purpose. If you immerse yourself in the blogosphere you will quickly learn that social proof can be a more important source of influence than actual education, experience, or accomplishment. Mitch Joel recently remarked in his podcast that it seems “dangerous” to him that the least experienced people on the social web seem to carry the most authority, largely by racking up social proof.
On the Internet, it is far too easy to become a guru. The entry barriers to being a social media marketer are so low that I recently met with a young man who had never taken a marketing class, never had a marketing job, never worked in sales — in fact, had not had a job of any kind since graduating from high school — and is now representing himself as a social media expert based on fake badges he had plunked down on his website.
Of course this is ridiculous but also commonplace. Can you imagine somebody in this same situation advertising themselves as an “engineer,” or an “accountant,” or a “professional athlete?” Twitter followers, Facebook likes, positive reviews, Google “plusses” — the most valued commodities of social proof — can all be purchased on eBay. You can certainly fake your way into our profession like no other.
And then something happened …
I don’t want to sound like a “victim” in all of this, but the fact is that if you are immersed in the social web, corruption is foisted upon all of us at almost every turn. If you examine our working conditions objectively, a large part of the economic value delivered by the social web is being created through deception, stealing, gaming the system, and faking your way to glory. It’s enough to make you stop and think … and maybe just stop all together.
But just as I was ready to publish this article, something really weird happened.
I don’t spend a lot of time checking my Google Analytics but I decided to look at the keywords people were using to find my blog last month. Here is what I found:
This made my heart skip a beat.
I can’t explain this connection at all but in the last 30 days, 175 people typed a single word into Google — “hope” — and landed on this blog. It was probably the precise message I needed to see at this disheartening moment in my career.
Sure the social web can be a strange place. But it has also given a lot to me. Thousands of connections, hundred of friends, dozens of customers and partners and wonderful career opportunities. Exactly one year ago I wrote a post called The Spirituality of Social Media and today I’m being whiny and cranky. Maybe I’ve fallen down on the job a little since then but I guess that’s part of human nature too. There is something to be said for enduring and prevailing. Endurance creates character, and character creates hope.
When you get down to it, we can only impact our own little sliver of the world, and for me that’s {grow}. Sometimes I do get tired of the ugliness, but you know, it can be different, a least here. People doing a search for “hope” … and finding me. Wow. That’s a kick in the pants. I’ve tried to lift up many other people over the years and now I maybe I need to lift myself … endure … prevail … and get back to the job of dispensing hope.
What do you think? Will you join me?












You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow.
Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here.
-Mark Schaefer

