@markwschaefer
{grow}
  • Home
  • You
    • Are we a fit?
    • Reputation
  • Us
    • Mark W. Schaefer
    • Client List
  • Services
    • Consulting
    • Corporate Social Media Workshops
    • Social Media Strategy
    • Social Media Management
    • Speaking
    • Teaching
    • Instant Marketing Advice
  • Media & Publications
    • Mark Schaefer’s Books
    • Social Media From Scratch
    • Free Resources
  • {grow} Blog
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Press Inquiries

Posts tagged social media legal issues


The “Instagram Act” and How to Protect Your Photos Online

May 8th

Tweet

6 comments

law book

By Kerry Gorgone {grow} Contributing Columnist

The Internet is a bit like the Wild West when it comes to protecting intellectual property and a new law makes it even a little more difficult to lay claim to your images without some proactive measures on your part.

The controversial Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act, which just received royal assent in the U.K., permits the use of “orphan works” — copyrighted works for which the owner cannot be identified. In most cases, the owner is dead, although it’s also possible that he or she simply has no interest in laying claim to the work.

Permitted uses under the new law would include digitizing archival library collections of unpublished works for purposes of preservation, but the law also allows commercial, for-profit uses of these works, such as advertising.

Photography groups vehemently opposed the legislation on the grounds that they stand to lose ownership and control over any images they post online.  Critics have compared the law to the sweeping changes that Instagram made (and later unmade) to the app’s terms of use in December 2012.

Artists and photographers everywhere need to take proactive measures to protect their creative works, placing watermarks on images prior to uploading them online, and populating metadata with ownership information.

The U.K. media is also recommending that photographers and artists register each individual work with the U.S. Copyright Office or the PLUS Registry in the U.K. to ensure that they are identifiable. This way, even if someone could strip identifying information out of an image and repost it online, an interested owner can always come forward to claim their work. Many have cited the cost and time required to register each individual work as prohibitive, but at the moment, there aren’t many options.

Individual authors / artists registering through the U.S. Copyright Office could try registering works as a compilation, provided they published them all within the same year. (37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)) The filing fee for registering groups of photos is currently $65. At minimum, this reduces the likelihood that a work will be considered “orphaned” in the first instance.

Obstacles abound for copyright holders, including the fact that the U.S. Copyright Office does not offer a reverse image search. In the U.K., the PLUS Registry only holds names, and the “upload and search on an image” function does not yet work. Still, anything is better than nothing, given that the law has passed.

PLUS-Registry

Another important thing to note is that the U.S. Copyright Office saves images for only ten years, unless the copyright holder pays an additional $470 for “full-term retention of a published deposit,” so the value of registration after that point is questionable.

One thing photographers can do is monitor Google for uses of their copyrighted works. Google’s sophisticated search technology does permit reverse image searches, so users can upload their copyrighted image and see matching images identified by Google. This will help copyright owners to detect infringing uses, so they can assert their rights against the infringing party.

Reverse-Image-Search
As theoretically devastating as this development is for photographers, I really think that most works affected will be works no owner will ever claim; images that previously could not be used because of a potential copyright claim that would never materialize.

Companies don’t want legal headaches anymore than you do. They’re unlikely to intentionally use works that someone might sue over. Given the huge body of available images, there’s no reason to think they’d elect to steal a copyrighted work when they could find (or create) any number of suitable images for advertising purposes.

Bottom line: protect yourself to the extent you can. Wouldn’t you do that anyway?

Kerry O'Shea Gorgone

Kerry O’Shea Gorgone, JD/MBA, is an attorney who teaches New Media Marketing in the Internet Marketing Master of Science Program at Full Sail University in Winter Park Florida. Follow her on Twitter: KerryGorgone

Photo courtesy Flickr Creative Commons umjeandoan

instagram, intellectual property, social media law, social media legal issues

Is Facebook a human right or a weapon?

Jan 27th

Tweet

12 comments

There was a very disturbing and significant social media-related court ruling last week that, curiously, has received little notice or commentary on the web. Let’s change that shall we?

A U.S. Federal Appeals Court ruled that an Indiana state law that bans registered sex offenders from Facebook is unconstitutional.

The ruling means thousands of Indiana’s registered sex offenders are now free to use Facebook and other social sites used by millions of children with computers and smartphones.

Is social media a human right?

The appeal was made by an Indianapolis man who had been convicted and served three years in prison on two counts of child exploitation.  The overturned Indiana law had said that anyone convicted of sex crimes against children could be barred for life from using any social media site accessible to children.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana represented the man and argued that sex offenders are unjustly barred from using Twitter and Facebook, which can be used to do legitimate business over the Internet.  The ACLU position was that the state must protect children “but should not do this with a law so broad that it prevents someone convicted of an offense years, or even decades ago, from engaging in a host of innocent communications via social media.”

The 7th District US Court of Appeals agreed with the ACLU and overturned the law, which has been in place since 2008.

I am a defender of free speech of course but believe this ruling is exceptional in how it ignores the power of social media as a potential weapon of destruction. Why is the State of Indiana willingly and knowingly putting convicted child molesters back in business?

Re-arming the criminals?

There are lots of examples in our society where we take freedom away from those who aim to harm us and infringe on the freedom of others.  If you kill somebody, your right to carry a gun and live free comes to an abrupt end … probably forever. If you are known child molester, you need to stay away from school yards, Boy Scout troops, youth groups, and any other place children gather. Forever.

For a child molester, Facebook is an intoxicating playground. How can we allow our government to put this weapon back in the hands of the criminal?  Do we really think convicted child molesters living free in our community will not be preying on more innocent children through online social networks?

According to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, there are approximately 750,000 registered sex offenders in the United States, a number that has soared 23 percent in five years, in part due to web-based predatory behavior.

Do you want these people hunting your children on Facebook?

Taking action

Although this is a state issue, it has national implications. I realize that the legal system is complex and many court cases are nuanced. This is not one of them. This is just wrong. Scary wrong.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller

Greg Zoeller

Here is the good news. The Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller hasn’t announced yet whether he will accept this decision or appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court.

I have not been able to find an email address for this gentleman but I am going to tweet him at @GregZoeller.  If you would like to join me, here is a handy tweet for you:

Attorney General @GregZoeller, appeal the ruling that allows sex offenders to stalk children on Facebook. Thank you. http://ow.ly/hbLoP  

Of course no law can substitute for good parenting and teaching your children about being safe on the web. One good resource is here.

Please feel free to weigh in on this issue in the comment section.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
child safety on facebook, facebook legal issues, social media legal issues
  • Subscribe to {Grow}

    Enter your Email
  • Welcome to {grow}

    You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow. Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here. -Mark Schaefer
  • Follow Mark

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on Google+Follow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on RSS
  • Book Mark to Speak!

  • Groups We Believe In

  • Search

  • Categories

  • The Archives

    •  2013 (108)
      • May (17)
      • April (21)
      • March (24)
      • February (21)
      • January (25)
    •  2012 (281)
      • December (20)
      • November (22)
      • October (23)
      • September (22)
      • August (25)
      • July (24)
      • June (25)
      • May (25)
      • April (21)
      • March (25)
      • February (23)
      • January (26)
    •  2011 (274)
      • December (24)
      • November (22)
      • October (20)
      • September (25)
      • August (25)
      • July (21)
      • June (27)
      • May (27)
      • April (20)
      • March (23)
      • February (24)
      • January (16)
    •  2010 (222)
      • December (18)
      • November (17)
      • October (19)
      • September (19)
      • August (17)
      • July (17)
      • June (15)
      • May (18)
      • April (19)
      • March (21)
      • February (24)
      • January (18)
    •  2009 (190)
      • December (21)
      • November (17)
      • October (22)
      • September (21)
      • August (27)
      • July (30)
      • June (15)
      • May (26)
      • April (11)
RSS Feeds
Top | Copyright © 2013 Schaefer Marketing Solutions: We Help Businesses {grow}