Posts tagged social media measurement
It’s not just ROI. It’s RELEVANCE!
Jul 12th
The other day I was driving home from a family vacation using an iPhone app called “Navigon.” This is an excellent GPS and mapping application that gets me where I want to go without the expense and hassle of having schlepping another device.
So I was wondering … why am I not using a mapping application from Rand McNally, the dominant market leader in all things maps for decades? For most of my life a well-worn copy of a Rand McNally atlas of United States maps was a fixture in my car. Can you even name another company that made U.S. road maps? Certainly, Rand was the gold standard for getting you to where you wanted to go.
The company has a minor entry in the GPS device market and are usually grouped under the “other” category in the analyst reports. A search for Rand McNally in the iTunes app store delivers one sad little entry that allows you to “vote for the best small towns of 2011 — right from your mobile device!” Wow.
Sad. Sad. Sad.
I can imagine the conversation among the Rand McNally executives five years ago … “Digital? Are you CRAZY??? Do you know what the ROI is on our paper maps? Why in the world would we ever cut into that profit margin? Nobody seems to be able to demonstrate an ROI on digital maps!”
It’s probably the same conversation that echoed through the halls of Kodak … “But we make so much money on film! What is the ROI for sharing digital photos on the Internet? It’s folly!”
I wonder what the ROI of bankrupt is?
And yet, if you have ever given a speech, a webinar, or a class on social media marketing, I can almost guarantee you have received this question: “But how do we measure the ROI of this stuff?”
Look, I’m a true-blue ROI guy. Frankly, money is one of my favorite things. I’m a measurement fanatic and a data geek. But pull up a chair and let me give you a dose of reality here. If you don’t have a digital strategy, your business is going to die.
And by digital, I don’t mean “a website.” In the last two years, 68 percent of the Fortune 100 companies had a year-over-year decline in their website page views. Why? Because people are not looking for you on websites any more (unless you work for Amazon, eBay or Etsy of course). For most companies, having a website is simply not enough these days.
Every business exists to create shareholder value. But please don’t overlook the possibility of not even existing in two years because you are milking an Excel spreadsheet for all its worth. There are lots of bright people out there that want your company to die. Be them, or hire them. Just don’t hold on to old business models until the banks are nailing your door shut.
It’s not just ROI. It can’t be just ROI. It’s relevancy. Don’t be Rand.
OK?
What are we going to do with all the social media ads?
May 10th
As I meet with many social media start-up hopefuls, I find that nearly every company is pinning its monetization hopes on one thing — advertising. I began to wonder … where is all this advertising going to go? Where will come from? And how are we going to know if it is doing any good? Will it be diluted into oblivion? Luckily, I found somebody with an answer …
Guest post by {grow} community member Irv Shapiro
Social media providers are under intense pressure to generate additional revenue through advertising. The upcoming Facebook IPO is just the tip of the iceberg. The social media giant also announced it will soon display ads on mobile apps, thus contributing to the race to capture additional advertising revenue in the social space.
Twitter’s “enhanced profile pages” — and features on other social networking sites — are also clearly intended to drive ad-based revenues and bolster the bottom lines of social media providers. Everywhere you look it seems, we are going to be dealing with more and more advertising!
Obviously this presents new multichannel opportunities for businesses and marketers. But with all of these new forms of social media advertising targeting consumers, how can businesses ensure their ads are actually generating a return on their advertising expenditures?
The Problem with Social Ad Spend
The connection between social media ad spend and social channel ROI has been murky. Even those fully committed to social advertising have not always demanded the kind of rigorous ROI analyses that are typically applied to other marketing investments. In many cases, businesses have simply lumped social ad returns into the generic category of “improved brand awareness.”
Yet in today’s marketing environment, there is no excuse not to have total visibility about the returns we are receiving for our social ad dollars. Luckily, the technology is keeping pace.
A new generation of analytics
The gap between social channel investments and clear ROI is driving the implementation of a new generation of online and offline analytics, many of which utilize “call tracking” solutions.
Call tracking enables marketers to identify the social ads and campaigns that are producing the best results for the business, tracking the impact of advertising across multiple channels and delivery platforms. By assigning unique local numbers to each social media ad, the organization achieves a new level of granularity, capturing actionable insights that can be used to justify social channel spend and create a more optimized social marketing strategy.
For example, New York City’s Marquis Dental Spa (client) was struggling to determine the actual ROI of specific social channel ads and campaigns. To gain a more accurate picture of the returns they were receiving for the social investments, the company assigned more than 250 unique local numbers to ads delivered through paid search, Facebook, LinkedIn and other channels.
The campaign’s use of unique local numbers enabled the company to connect leads to specific social ads, thus generating solid ROI for every dollar invested in social media and other channels. As a result, the company optimized its advertising strategy and reduced its cost-per-new-patient metric by 50 percent. They plowed this savings back into ad spending on Facebook, their highest performing lead source during the campaign.
The opportunity for highly targeted ads has never been greater, and as more channels emerge, it is likely that the costs will be very competitive compared to other alternatives. But like all good marketing efforts, we will need to use these new analytic tools to optimize social channel investments.
Irv Shapiro is the CEO and CTO of Ifbyphone and is responsible for overall business strategy and corporate leadership.
Always measure your social media effort. Except when you shouldn’t.
Mar 6th
Matt Ridings is one of the most intellectually challenging and entertaining friends I have made on Twitter. During a recent debate on {grow} about social media measurement he chimed in with such a smart counter-point that I wanted to provide it as a feature for the entire {grow} community …
Guest post by {grow} community member Matt Ridings
Social media measurement. This is a seemingly simple issue, with a complex point. Or perhaps a “nuanced” point is more accurate. I’m obviously a believer in data, it’s a big part of what I’ve done over my career. So to be clear, trying to measure whether something has a meaningful impact is something I am in support of. And you should always measure … unless you shouldn’t. Here is what I mean …
1) Spreadsheets should never be a substitute for business instincts. Too many fall back on spreadsheets as means to avoid risk and accountability. Thus using ROI is an excuse not to move forward with something they don’t understand.
2) Sometimes there is no ROI to measuring ROI. Just because something *can* be measured doesn’t mean it *should* be measured. If the cost of trying to measure an activity outweighs the gain of the activity itself, or eats too far into that gain then why would you measure it? It doesn’t mean there was no gain, it means you have to make a decision based on more than spreadsheets as to whether you can mentally correlate enough benefit to quantifying the activity to continue doing it.
3) Understanding appropriate time horizons and objectives is critical. Numbers mean nothing if you aren’t balancing them against proper expectations. If you don’t have a solid, educated theory as to how long an activity should take before it starts showing its full benefits (in a relationship driven economy the long tail activity becomes the norm so this becomes even more critical) then how can you know when to make a decision to stop or increase that activity?
4) Achieving a return on an activity is meaningless without a knowledge of the return on activities you *could* have been doing. Companies have limited resources, they can’t do everything, so they have to maximize those that they undertake. Getting a 20% return on something is a failure if you needed a 40% return to make it a viable alternative to some other activity that gets 30%. So “achieving an ROI” isn’t the same thing as “achieving success.”
5) Understanding the impact of measurement, both positive and negative, is also critical. Measurement itself impacts the behaviors and decisions inside the organization. How does the measurement motivate or impact the individuals? Does it do so in ways that are beneficial to the customer or in ways that benefit the company in the short term but cut its throat in the long term?
I’ll stop there, but the point is basically “It’s not whether you measure, it’s whether you understand what to do with it.”
Agree? Would love to hear your thoughts on “rational measurement!”
Matt Ridings, aka @techguerilla, is the co-Founder and CEO of SideraWorks, a new Social Business consultancy founded with Amber Naslund.
The social media measurement smackdown
Feb 19th
Last week I was involved in what one tweeter characterized as an “ROI smackdown.”
I was speaking on a panel for Social Media Week New York when one of my fellow panelists said “This ROI stuff is just a bunch of crap. I’m so tired of it. You can’t measure what you’re doing and people should not even try.”
I began to twitch.
“I agree,” said the second panelist. “Too much focus is placed on measurement.”
My head began to throb.
“As a social media marketer, I can’t measure what I do,” said the moderator. “I just do it.”
At that point, the dam broke.
“Respectfully,” I began, “I disagree with everything that has just been said! As marketers we should measure EVERYTHING. And generally, we can.”
And it kind of went downhill from there. This dialogue is nothing new. It is merely a symptom of an anti-measurement bias creeping into the blogosphere.
The gurus aren’t helping.
Unfortunately, the tone is being set by some of our most beloved social media celebrities such as Gary Vaynerchuk, David Meerman Scott and other high-profile pundits. When Gary is asked about the ROI of social media his famous reply is usually ‘Well, what’s the ROI of your mother?” Scott’s retort is usually something like “Why have a double standard? You don’t measure the ROI of the company receptionist.”
These make great sound bites, and I sincerely respect these fellas and love the passion and wisdom they bring to their work. But after hearing their rants on measurement for a couple of years now, I am agitated to the point of breaking out in hives when I hear it. Promoting an anti-measurement agenda is misguided and confusing to young marketers.
First, in their defense, I think the point they are trying to make is that social media represents an evolution in the way we communicate and we shouldn’t let an ROI calculation (or lack of one) stop us from getting on board. If you are waiting for a pie chart to make a decision, you’re probably missing the point.
Second, I fully recognize that calculating true ROI is frequently impossible. However there are many meaningful leading indicators and non-financial measures that can be tied to stakeholder value. We have so much data coming at us, there is simply no excuse not to measure.
Why you MUST measure.
Here are four reasons why you MUST measure the results of your corporate social media activities.
1) There is an implied value to everything. At some point in the life of every company, there will be a financial imperative to slash overhead costs. The bubble always bursts, at least in a free economy. When that happens, everything will be evaluated under the icy glare of number-crunchers — do we cut or not cut? This is the day of reckoning that defines the ”implied economic value” of any effort. Yes, the social media marketing effort will come under scrutiny. So will the receptionist, your wireless plan, and all these other mundane daily activities not normally associated with an Excel spreadsheet. When it’s your turn to justify the existence of your marketing efforts, you better be able to demonstrate business value, and it better be an explanation more convincing than “Don’t you see that measuring social media is like measuring your mother!”
2) If we are expending human effort, it should be justified. Every economic activity in a corporation directly or indirectly has to contribute to shareholder value or eventually it will go away.
Let’s look at how “un-free” social media really is. Let’s assume you have one person working full-time on social media marketing. We’ll assign that person a salary of $60,000. In a typical company, standard health, 401(k) and other benefit costs equal another 50% of the base salary, or in this case, $30,000. We’ll assign another 20% of base salary for overhead such as office space, shared services support and technology. That’s $12,000. We won’t even address travel, training, or bonuses.
So, our minimal full-up cost for one social media professional is $102,000. As a business owner, are you willing to spend more than $100,000 per year without requiring any accountability for a return? What kind of a company are you running?
3) If you’re not measuring, how do you know you’re making progress? Although Gary V may not be plotting his social media efforts on a chart, I guarantee you he has an acute sense of the return on his social media presence and also knows the point where there is a diminishing return on his efforts. That’s easy for him (and me too, by the way) because he can see the results every day. It’s more complicated in a corporation. Explaining that “it works just because I know it works” may be OK for an entrepreneur but it ain’t going to fly in a board room.
4) There is no excuse not to measure. I’m not advocating that every social media effort has a demonstrable ROI. I’m a practical guy. It may be cost-prohibitive or even impossible to determine the specific ROI of your efforts. Sometimes you need to look at qualitative tools for social media measurement. But there is no excuse for not tracking key measures that contribute to your company’s goals.
I can’t imagine asking a client to trust the progress of our social media effort without some indication of continuous improvement. To support your credibility, your long-term viability, and your personal career in social media marketing, YOU. MUST. MEASURE.
So please Mr. Vaynerchuk, Mr. Scott and all the other gurus out there … please re-consider what could be mis-interpreted as anti-measurement rants. It makes for entertaining quotes, but it’s providing confusing advice to many young people looking to you for thought leadership.
Time for your thoughts in the comment section …










You’re in marketing for one reason: Grow.
Grow your company, reputation, customers, impact, profits. Grow yourself. This is a community that will help. It will stretch your mind, connect you to fascinating people, and provide some fun along the way. I am so glad you’re here.
-Mark Schaefer

