The start-up strategy for beating Facebook

Share via email
Share

beating facebook

Two of the hottest social network startups have taken decidedly different turns in their fortunes. If we compare Snapchat and Blab we can tease out lessons for all of us when it comes to strategies for beating Facebook.

If I were a betting person, in 2014 I might have placed my bet on Blab over Snapchat to win in a fair race.

Blab, a live-streaming app, occupied a unique space. It solved a big problem — bringing groups of people together for a live video conversation in an extremely easy and user-friendly manner. You could also save the videos and upload them onto other platforms. Blab enjoyed rapid and early adoption by many influential people. And a critically important fact — it had access to a unique technology to make it happen.

On the other hand, Snapchat took a very long time to gain momentum (it launched in 2011). By rejecting a $3 billion takeover bid by Facebook, it immediately became a Zuckerberg target. And it didn’t own any significant intellectual property that Facebook couldn’t easily copy. (In fact a South Korean app called Snow is almost identical!). Snapchat doesn’t necessarily solve any unique industry problem like Blab — It had cool filters that made you look like a cat or throwing up a rainbow. Top social media influencers were slow to adopt the technology.

And yet, this week TechCrunch carried news about Facebook Live which sounds the death knell for Blab:

The platform will soon let you do two-person remote broadcasts, pre-schedule your streams and create a virtual waiting room for viewers and broadcast with MSQRD’s face masks.

So why is Blab in a death spiral while Snapchat is on a meteoric rise?

The key to beating Facebook?

When I consult with start-ups in the digital networking space, I look for three things:

  1. Does the new application solve a unique problem that is relevant to a large number of people?
  2. Does the company have intellectual property that can give them time to scale and fend off competitors?
  3. Does the company have access to capital and connections that will allow it to scale very quickly?

(For a great case study on how WhatsApp met these criteria, here is a superb case study)

Blab appeared to have a “yes” in all three areas, but it made a critical mistake. It could not stabilize the reliability of the platform for its biggest fans … power users with large captive audiences like Michael Stelzner, Joel Comm, and myself who were embracing Blab for business applications.

My friend Mike Allton put it very well when he recently wrote about the importance of momentum to Blab:

Blab, whether intentionally or not, rocked the confidence of the broadcasters and influencers most prominently using the network. The impact on the future of the network is not to be taken lightly. Social networks are often compared to parties or local pubs. No one goes out to be alone. You go to a party or to your favorite hangout to see your friends and have fun. That’s why influencers are so critical to the success of a network. They bring established audiences to the party! And when they leave … that can spell disaster.

Blab had so much potential. Many of us loved and supported Blab even through their technical disasters. But they could not rise above it and leverage that incredible power. It took too long to scale and Facebook took advantage of the vulnerability.

Now let’s look at the Snapchat side.

At its beginning, Snapchat could probably say “yes” to only one of my three key start-up questions. But it had an intangible that trumped everything: It built and sustained a deep emotional connection with its young users. Snapchat became their place. Facebook was for grandma. Snapchat was weird and wonderful and youthful.

And Facebook can’t beat that.

The battleground is hearts and minds, not bits and bytes

This is a significant lesson for every start-up in the digital space that might threaten Facebook. You’re probably not beating Facebook on engineering, resources, or speed. You may not even be able to beat them with patents. But you can beat them with emotion.

Blab turned its back on the powerful emotional support it earned. But Snapchat was smart enough to see that the emotional connection was their path forward and doubled-down on creating a fun and quirky platform … that always works.

If you look at their tech strategy, they have been slow to develop business-related functionality like stat dashboards, focusing on new users functionality to secure their niche.

Of course nothing is ever clean and straightforward. There were contributing complexities to the Blab saga and it is still limping along. But it is just a matter of time before Facebook Live adds every function Blab offered and then it will become a fond and distant memory like former social media hotspots Meerkat and Ello.

So that is my observation on the challenges of the social start-up scene. What do you think?

Illustration courtesy Flickr CC and martialartsnomad

Share via email
Share

All posts

  • Blab shows that even if you have a damn good mousetrap, true success requires massively scalable cloud infrastructure and a ton of engineering talent, or the cash and talent acquisition chops to rapidly go get those two things.

    Ironically, what makes startups break big now is the uncool, behind the scenes stuff more so than the obvious, customer experience and functionality stuff.

  • In some ways the traditional model is turned upside down. Instead of “making something” you have to “be something.” Thanks for commenting Jay.

  • What did I miss that’s news today?

    Blab announced they were pivoting a couple of months ago and appears to still be in business with it’s new model of private chats.

    The beta was good. Supporting podcasts type shows never seemed like a business model to me.

  • This article was not meant to be news, it was an analysis of why one solid business didn’t work and an improbable one did. Many people in the business loved Blab and thought it had a solid chance, including me. Thanks for commenting Warren!

  • I’m re-reading my comment and see that I did look sarcastic. (bad habit).. I actually meant to ask if there was a change. Links to this post appeared to be saying blab was dead or dying.

    I loved blab. But once you posted about losing a recording, I started watching… a week later, I lost two and stop using it regularly.

    I never did get how they were supposed to be catering to podcasters. Good relationships to cater but just didn’t feel like a sustainable business plan.

    Funny thing is, what they seem to be doing post-podcasters is to compete in Snapchat’s space. Reading your post in that light, you hit the nail on the head!

  • Well said sir. Thanks for commenting!

  • You mean like 99.9 percent of every start-up? It’s a tough tough world. You need all the stars to align, as I note in my post.

The Marketing Companion Podcast

Why not tune into the world’s most entertaining marketing podcast that I co-host with Tom Webster.

View details

Let's plot a strategy together

Want to solve big marketing problems for a little bit of money? Sign up for an hour of Mark’s time and put your business on the fast-track.

View details

Close